Shaping the future of anesthesiology in Brazil: the role of women in leadership and academia
Stefania Lacerda Garcia, Roberta Figueiredo Vieira, Claudia Marquez Simões, Maria Angela Tardelli, Liana Maria Tôrres de Araújo Azi
Abstract
Despite the growing number of women entering anesthesiology worldwide, their representation in academic leadership, authorship, and decision-making positions remains disproportionately low. Structural and cultural barriers, along with factors such as imposter syndrome, continue to limit their visibility and career advancement. In Brazil and other South American countries, gradual progress has occurred in recent decades, with increased participation of women in professional and institutional roles, though true parity is still distant. Evidence shows that female leadership and strong mentorship networks are key drivers of greater engagement and academic productivity among women. Advancing gender equity in anesthesiology requires sustained institutional commitment, culturally sensitive strategies, and inclusive initiatives that empower women to participate fully and shape the future of the specialty.
Keywords
References
1. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM. The state of women in academic medicine: Exploring pathways to equity. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2020
2. Scheffer M. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2025 [Internet]. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde, 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 28]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/ demografia_medica_brasil_2025.pdf.
3. Bosco L, Lorello GR, Flexman AM, Hastie MJ. Women in anaesthesia: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e134-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.021. PMid:31983412.
4. Mehta S, Barrett K, Menon K. Career success for women in academic medicine: eight self-help strategies. Br J Anaesth. 2025;S0007-0912(25):00548-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.011. PMid:40987666.
5. Rong LQ, Khan FM, Naik A, Robinson NB, Hameed I, Anderson LP, et al. Gender differences in the authorship of contemporary anaesthesia literature: a cross-sectional study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(5):e162-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.023. PMid:33640120.
6. Pan S, Zheng W, Rong LQ. Gender representation on editorial boards of anaesthesiology journals from 2010 to 2020. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(3):e53-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.017. PMid:35778275.
7. Garcia SL, Simões CM, Carmona MJC, Azi LMTA. Gender representation in anesthesiology research: a historical perspective from the Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025;75(2):844584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844584. PMid:39755274.
8. SBA: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Female representation in SBA leadership: national board, regional societies, and committees (2021–2025). Rio de Janeiro (BR): SBA; 2025. Internal report (unpublished).
9. Brasil. Lei nº 9.504, de 30 de setembro de 1997. Estabelece normas para as eleições [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 30 set. 1997 [cited 2025 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9504.htm.
10. Bustillo M, Gotian R. A mentoring circle supports women anaesthesiologists at every career stage. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e190-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.014. PMid:31982113.
11. Wong CA, Moonesinghe SR, Boer C, Hemmings HC Jr, Hunter JM. Women in anaesthesia, a special issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e40-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.038. PMid:31973824.
Submitted date:
11/10/2025
Accepted date:
11/14/2025
Facebook
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Reddit
Email